Lutheran Puritanism? Adiaphora in Lutheran Orthodoxy and Possible Commonalities in Reformed Orthodoxy

American Theological Inquiry 2:1 (January 2009): 61–83

Daniel R. Hyde

Sixteenth and seventeenth century Lutherans rejected liturgical rites that undermined justification by faith, sometimes sounding remarkably “Puritan.” This article explores the concept of adiaphora and common ground with Reformed liturgical theology.

This article delves into the often-misunderstood Lutheran concept of adiaphora—“indifferent matters” in worship such as ceremonies and rituals. It traces its development from the Augsburg Confession through tumultuous controversies to the Formula of Concord.

Challenging simplistic caricatures, it highlights how Lutherans rejected rites that undermined justification by faith alone, sometimes adopting a "Puritan-esque" stance against Roman Catholic impositions, while retaining practices for peace and order.

Exploring historical polemics with Rome and Calvinists, the article uncovers surprising common ground between confessional Lutheran and Reformed orthodoxies, particularly in the free celebration of evangelical feast days like Christmas and Easter as expressions of Christian liberty rather than obligation.

This study fosters greater appreciation for Lutheran liturgics and bridges divides in Reformation theology for scholars and enthusiasts of church history and worship practices.


On Lutheran-Reformed Differences and Similarities, see:



For citations, excerpts, translations, etc. of this academic journal article, see Permissions.

To attribute: Daniel R. Hyde, “Lutheran Puritanism? Adiaphora in Lutheran Orthodoxy and Possible Commonalities in Reformed Orthodoxy.” American Theological Inquiry 2:1 (January 2009): 61–83.

Previous
Previous

For Freedom Christ Has Set Us Free: John Owen’s A Discourse Concerning Liturgies, And Their Imposition

Next
Next

Not Holy But Helpful: A Case for the “Evangelical Feast Days” in the Reformed Tradition